Organizational Structure

DAM Operation Model Part 2: Organizational Structures

by Chris Ransick

In our inaugural post, we introduced the DAM Operations Model and why it is needed. This week, we are shifting gears to discuss a pivotal aspect that can often make or break the success of DAM implementations: the Organizational Structure.

Some might wonder, "Why does organizational structure matter in DAM?" or "Isn't it all about technology?" While the technological framework is undoubtedly crucial, the human element—how teams are structured and interact—plays an equally vital role. Even the most advanced DAM system can falter without a clear and effective organizational structure.

This second installment will explore the different organizational model structures suited for DAM, their advantages, potential pitfalls, and best practices. Whether you are a seasoned DAM professional or just starting, understanding the nuances of organizational structure can be your key to unlocking the full potential of your DAM operations.

Organizational Structure

The optimal organizational structure for managing aDigital Asset Management (DAM) system can vary based on several factors, including the size and type of the organization, the number and diversity of digital assets, and the organization's specific goals and needs. Here are some commonly used structures: 

1. Centralized Structure    
In this model, a single team or department is responsible for managing the     DAM system, which could be the IT department, a dedicated DAM team, or a     marketing or creative team, depending on the nature of the organization     and the assets involved. The benefit of this model is that it provides     clear responsibility and control over the system, ensuring consistent     standards and practices. However, it may also lead to bottlenecks or delays     if the central team becomes overloaded. 

Centralized DAM Structure Roles:

DAM Director/Manager
: A high-level role responsible for the overall DAM strategy, governance, and aligning DAM operations with organizational goals.
DAM Administrators/Technicians: Handle the technical aspects, ensuring the system runs smoothly, performing upgrades, and trouble shooting issues.
Metadata Specialists/Librarians: Oversee the taxonomy and metadata tagging to ensure assets are categorized and searchable.
User Support and Training Specialists: Train new users, provide ongoing support, and assist in the rollout of any new features or changes. 

Advantages:
• Clear ownership and responsibility
• Consistent processes across the organization
• Easier to implement and maintain standards  

2. Decentralized Structure   
In a decentralized model, various teams or departments have responsibility for managing their digital assets within the DAM system. This can provide more flexibility and responsiveness, as each team can manage its assets in a way that best suits its needs. However, it may also lead to inconsistencies in managing assets and require more coordination to ensure that everyone uses the system effectively. 

Decentralized DAM Structure Roles:
DAM Coordinator
: A more strategic role ensuring different departments or teams follow the broader DAM strategy and best practices.
Departmental DAM Managers: Each department (e.g.,marketing, sales, design) has its own DAM manager responsible for the day-to-day operations within their department. 

Advantages:
• Flexibility to tailor the DAM system to the unique needs of each department
• Faster decision-making within departments   

3. Hybrid Structure   
Many organizations use a hybrid approach, where a central team oversees the overall management of the DAM system, but individual teams or departments are responsible for managing their assets. This can provide a good balance of control and flexibility. 

Hybrid DAM Structure Roles:
A combination of centralized and decentralized structures. A core centralized DAM team is responsible for overall strategy and governance, but individual departments also have their own DAM representatives or managers.

Advantages:
• Combines the strengths of both centralized and decentralized structures
• Provides a balance of consistency and flexibility  

4. Outsourced DAM Operations
Some organizations may choose to outsource certain aspects of DAM operations to external vendors or specialists, which can be useful if internal resources or expertise are lacking. 

Advantages:
• Access to specialized expertise without the need for in-house hiring
• It can be cost-effective depending on the scope of operations  

5. Operational Considerations Regardless of Structure
Regular DAM Governance Meetings
: No matter the structure, regular meetings should be held to discuss challenges, improvements, and updates and ensure that the DAM strategy aligns with the organization's objectives.
Continuous Training: Given that technologies and processes evolve, there should be ongoing training sessions for both new and existing users.
Feedback Mechanisms: Encourage users to provide feedback on the DAM system to identify potential areas of improvement. 

The optimal organizational structure for DAM will depend on an organization's specific needs and challenges. Still, the core aim should remain the same: to ensure digital assets are easily accessible, usable, and valuable to the organization. Regardless of the chosen structure, it's important to clearly define roles and responsibilities, provide appropriate training and support, and have effective governance mechanisms to ensure the DAM system is used effectively.

Contact DAM OPS 
©2024 DAM Ops Consulting, a Vista Grande Digital, LLC company
Acquia DAM, Brandfolder, Smartsheet, Picture Park, Adobe, Dropbox, Wedia, 4ALLPORTALS, Intelligencebank, Nuxeo, MediaBeacon, MediaValet, Esko, Brandworkz, Dalim, Stockpress, Canto, Extensis, Cloudinary, XiNet, Aprimo, Bynder, Extreme Reach, Resourcebase. Orange Logic, Opentext and Celum product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.